|
| |
Issue No 27 : June 2010The RVA meeting on 27 May was held in the Rusthall Social Club and was attended by 46 people. It was the Association's sixth Annual General Meeting and subscriptions were collected on the door. Membership currently stands at 73. The meeting began with this year's Annual Report from Association chair Jenny Blackburn, a copy of which you can read HERE.
She then moved on to discussing the crane which has appeared on the Rusthall skyline like a Martian from War of the Worlds. This is due to remain for 30 weeks until December. The project to replace Simmonds Court sheltered housing is being managed by the Town & Country Housing Group who are keeping to Considerate Constructors Scheme guidelines, which means that the crane will only work during restricted hours to minimise disruption to the neighbourhood. The developers are sending a representative, Rachel Murphy, to the 22 July RVA meeting. The 23 September RVA meeting will be addressed by Mr Goddard who will report on progress with the new Pembury Hospital with the aid of a computerised walk-through of the development.
Parish Council Developments
Southwood Road Pavilion Renovation
Councillor Edwards appealed for support for the RCYP's planning application along with suggestions for other uses for the hall, such as dancing classes and exercise groups. Survey forms have been delivered around the village so you can air your opinions. Please return them before the deadline. Concerns were raised about the security of the new building and Councillor Edwards replied that these would be considered in the planning and it was also hoped that involvement of the whole community, including the youth, would make it less of a target. He pointed out that the Council currently pays £8,000 a year on roof repairs for the old pavilion. The subject of security led to the topic of vandalism at the adjacent allotments where 20 sheds have recently been broken into and 4 burned down. This warmed the audience up nicely for the refreshment break, after which Inspector Simon Wilshaw from Kent Police stood up bravely and with good humour to reply to villagers' concerns.
|
Policing in Rusthall
Before addressing that issue though he first complimented the village on its thriving community and range of independent businesses and other facilities (doctors, fire station, school, Surestart etc.). He supports the Parish Council survey and hopes the new pavilion goes ahead, saying that the Police are happy to get involved on the security issue. Regarding the allotments, he said that there is currently no possibility of CCTV there because there is no suitable powered mounting point. Also most vandalism takes place in the dark when it would be useless anyway. He suggested that shed alarms might be a way forward, for which Police funding is available. The Pepenbury Project facility already has them. There is also money available to replace vandalised sheds through the Community Safety Partnership (Elaine Bolton). A further measure to discourage vandalism is that some work will be done by Probation Teams (i.e. those caught doing it) as part of Community Payback. He added that to support this it would help if more residents were willing to come forward as witnesses to anti-social behaviour. There followed a general and often heated discussion of the causes and possible solutions to anti-social behaviour. To the suggestion by Malcolm Geer that all the known but unproved perpetrators be locked up anyway, Insp. Wilshaw replied that however desirable this might seem, it was probably not supported by the law. He suggested a more practical if time-consuming measure might be to involve the known troublemakers in activities like community football. This led to a complaint that the Police should not be forced to act as social workers but a lady called Jo stood up to say that as the mother of 3 and 16 year old children living in social housing it was her opinion that parents should take more responsibility for the behaviour of their own children and not leave it to the Police. In reply to a complaint that Tunbridge Wells no longer had its own Emergency Room for 999 calls Insp Wilshaw replied that he believed that handling all calls at Maidstone was not only cheaper but more efficient because all calls could be entered on a central computer, and that the new system should make no difference at all to response times which depended purely on the manpower on hand in Tunbridge Wells at any moment. The debate continued but ended amicably enough with Insp. Wilshaw saying that he hoped also to attend the September RVA meeting to field any other queries and complaints.
RVA MEETING DATES FOR 2010
|
Useful Numbers
Jenny Blackburn, Chair 01892 546520 Email jennyblackb@googlemail.com
| |
NEWSLETTER BACK ISSUES
26
|
25
|
24
|
23
|
22
|
21
20
|
19
|
18
|
17
|
16
|
15
|
13
|
12
|
11
10
|
9
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1